WebApr 8, 2024 · I thought this was the most absurd thing I had ever heard. Rape was wrong, I knew that, everyone knew that! How could atheists say otherwise? They told me about Hume’s Guillotine, which shows that an Ought* cannot be derived from an Is.* For example, just because my house IS… Show more. 08 Apr 2024 06:22:39 Web18 views, 0 likes, 1 loves, 0 comments, 1 shares, Facebook Watch Videos from Trinity Lutheran Church in Glidden WI: 4/7/23
On the (in)significance of Hume’s Law SpringerLink
WebJun 14, 2010 · 1. If God does not exist, objective moral values and duties do not exist. 2. Objective moral values and duties do exist. The two premisses imply God’s existence but … WebFor one thing, as far as any categorical morality is concerned, Hume’s bluntly stated assertion that one cannot logically derive an “ought” from an “is” happens to be formally correct. Even if one could exhaustively describe the elements of our nature, the additional claim that we are morally obliged to act in accord with them, or to ... biltmore home furnishings
Is, Ought, and Nature
WebMay 4, 2010 · Those are my personal reasons for thinking that you can't derive ought from is. The perceptive reader will notice that it's really just one reason over and over again -- … WebAnswer (1 of 4): This problem has probably been around ever since people began thinking of ethics but David Hume formulated it in concrete terms in the 18th century. Basically the problem is that you cannot deduce from a set of facts what ought to be. For example, murders occur in this country. T... WebApr 11, 2024 · Hume: "You can't derive an ought from an is." God: "I am, thou shalt not." 11 Apr 2024 02:44:12 biltmore hollywood grand cinema