Mr Cranston, an employee of Flamingos night club, in London, was employed as a bouncer to keep order at the club's doors, and to break up scuffles and fights. On 18 July 1998, an incident occurred involving a customer, Mr Fitzgerald, and Mr Cranston, who threw a friend of his across a room. It was submitted that Mr Pollock had given Mr Cranston instructions to "impress upon Mr Fitzgerald that Mr Cranston was prepared to use physical force to ensure compliance with any i… WebMattis v Pollock (t/a Flamingos Nightclub) CA TLR 16 July The defendant’s doorman was involved in a fight in the club. He was pursued outside. He went to his flat about 500 …
Mattis v pollock ta flamingos nightclub 2003 46 weir
WebIn the Court of Appeal case of Mattis v. Pollock (t/a Flamingos Nightclub) a nightclub owner was held vicariously liable for the violent acts of an employed doorman. The Court … Web1 okt. 2003 · Mattis v Pollock [2003] IRLR 603 Until recently there was very little chance of successfully suing an employer for a deliberate assault by an employee. The law of … syswow64 file location
ate. The case of Mattis v Polloc
Web27 jun. 2016 · The decision of the House of Lords in Lister and Others v Hesley Hall Ltd and the cases that have followed upon it have dramatically extended the scope of an employer’s vicarious liability for a wrongdoing employee. Many of these cases have involved the liability of licensed traders for the deliberate and violent conduct of door stewards working on … Web1 sep. 2024 · Mattis v Pollock trading as Flamingos Nightclub. 2003 EWCA Civ 887 • Incident had developed in stages • But too narrow an approach to treat stabbing in. … Web11 jul. 2024 · In Mattis -v- Pollock (t/a) Flamingos Nightclub (The Times Law Report 16 July 2003) the Court of Appeal held that a club doorman who stabbed a person in the … syswow64 folder download windows 10